Royal Mail delivered 75.7% of first class post next day against a 93% target, and Ofcom is investigating. What Worcester's MP put on the record, and how to claim.

Royal Mail delivered 75.7% of first class post within one working day in the 2025/26 financial year, against a target of 93%, and the regulator has opened a formal investigation into the failure. (Ofcom, Ofcom investigates Royal Mail’s 2025/26 delivery performance, 1 June 2026)

Second class did no better. Royal Mail is required to deliver 98.5% of it within three working days. It managed 90.2%.

Those are national figures, not Worcester ones, and it matters to say so plainly. But Worcester is one of the places that pushed the issue onto the floor of the House of Commons, and the record of what our MP said there, and what the minister said back, is public. We have read it, and it is more specific than anything Royal Mail has said locally.

What Worcester’s MP put on the record

Worcester’s MP Tom Collins spoke in a Westminster Hall debate on Royal Mail’s performance on 18 March 2026. His complaint was not only about late letters. It was about what happened when he tried to get a straight answer.

“Many people in Worcester are very frustrated by the delays in the Royal Mail service, which are impacting their healthcare and their access to money,” he told the House. Having met Royal Mail representatives himself, he said, “what is even more concerning than everything else is how hard it is to get acceptance from the company about the issues that exist, a straight story and openness. That makes us question the character as well as the competence of Royal Mail’s management.”

He also made a point that cuts against the easy version of this story. “Royal Mail is under obligations that are not commercially sustainable and it does not receive the money to meet them. It is now in a doom loop of increasing prices and declining demand.” (Hansard, Royal Mail: Performance, Westminster Hall, 18 March 2026)

The business minister, Blair McDougall, named Worcester in his reply, alongside Hartlepool and Sheffield Central, as places where MPs raising constituents’ concerns “heard a completely different version of events in response”. He said he had met Royal Mail’s chief executive, that “it is galling that Royal Mail is increasing the price of its services but is not meeting delivery targets”, and that Ofcom expects Royal Mail to publish a detailed improvement plan.

The MP for neighbouring West Worcestershire, Dame Harriett Baldwin, told the same debate that her casework on postal delays rose sharply after Ofcom’s July 2025 decision to let Royal Mail change the universal service obligation, under which second class post moved to alternate weekdays.

Where the investigation stands

Royal Mail reported its own failure to Ofcom on 29 May 2026. Ofcom opened case CW/01344/05/26 three days later, on 1 June, examining compliance with condition 1.9.1 of its designated universal service provider conditions. The case is still open. It will also decide whether to impose a financial penalty.

This is not the first time. Ofcom has fined Royal Mail more than £37 million for delivery failures, in three separate penalties.

Ofcom penalties on Royal Mail for missing delivery targets
DateFine
October 2025£21 million
December 2024£10.5 million
November 2023£5.6 million

Royal Mail first and second class delivery performance in 2025/26 against target

The minister told MPs that the £21 million fine “was a clear signal”, and that before the takeover of Royal Mail the government secured a commitment from its new owners to prevent dividend payments until quality of service improves.

One thing we could not establish today. Royal Mail publishes delivery performance broken down by postcode area, which would give a figure for WR specifically. Its quality of service pages returned an error to us on 17 August and we could not read them, so we are not putting a Worcester percentage in print. We would rather leave a gap than guess at one.

What it means for you

Late post is not something you simply have to absorb, and the compensation rules are more generous than most people assume.

Complain to Royal Mail first, and get a case reference. Royal Mail operates its own complaints process and you need to exhaust it before anyone else will look at your case. Do it in writing if you can, and keep the reference number. If the delay affected a hospital appointment, a bank card, a court date or a benefits letter, say so explicitly: that is the detail that moves a complaint out of the standard queue.

Escalate if you are not satisfied. If Royal Mail’s answer does not resolve it, you can ask for the case to go to its Postal Review Panel, and after that to the independent postal redress scheme. Citizens Advice is the statutory consumer advocate for post and can advise you at any stage, free.

Claim for a delayed or lost item. Compensation for first and second class post is set out in Royal Mail’s published terms, and claiming requires proof of posting, so keep the receipt when you send anything that matters. For an item that has not arrived, there is a minimum waiting period before a claim can be made, which is why it is worth starting the clock by reporting it promptly rather than waiting to see if it turns up.

Tell your MP, because the casework is the evidence. The reason Worcester was named in the Commons at all is that residents reported problems to their MP, who could then put a pattern rather than an anecdote to Royal Mail. Tom Collins’s contact details are published on the parliamentary website.

Postal votes are treated separately. The minister told MPs that the government has sought specific assurances from Royal Mail on postal votes ahead of the coming elections, including sweeps of postboxes. If a postal ballot pack has not reached you in time, the route is your council’s elections team, not Royal Mail, because a replacement can be issued.

For other practical Worcester information, see our pages on roadworks and travel in Worcester, Worcester train times to London and Worcester house prices.

We will report the outcome of Ofcom’s investigation, including any penalty, when it is published.